Kaitlyn the Kleptomaniac

Kaitlyn

17

Traveller

thescreendoorslams:

Okay, since I’m STILL hearing people on the internet griping about the first Girl With The Dragon Tattoo poster, I felt the need to go on a little rant here. Bear with me. 

Look at the image on the left. Now look at the image on the right. One of these images is of a “sexualized woman,” and the other is not. If you cannot tell the difference between a nude woman, and a sexualized woman, you are an idiot. 

The fact that Rooney Mara is naked in the TGWTDT poster does not make her sexualized or objectified. David Fincher has not “missed the point,” he’s actually making a very insightful observation into the way nude women are portrayed in advertising and in films. Lisbeth Salander may be nude in this poster, but she’s miles away from the expected depiction of a naked woman. Rooney Mara said it perfectly herself:

There’s a certain way people are used to seeing nude women, and that’s in a submissive, coy pose, not looking at the camera. And in this poster, I’m looking dead into the camera with no expression on my face. I think it freaks a lot of people out.

The image of Katy Perry is clearly what Rooney is talking about here (I don’t have anything visceral against Katy Perry, I’m just using a picture of her to make a point). She looks sweet, coyly hiding herself from the camera, but still looking inviting and sexually available. Rooney Mara is the exact opposite. She is bold and uninhibited in her nudity, and she looks right at the viewer with a piercing glare that conveys an unmistakable message: come near me, and you’re dead. This is hardly in keeping with the conventional images of naked women that we are used to seeing. 

Nudity and sexualization are not the same thing. Try to actually understand an image and look closely at it in relation to societal conventions and expectations before you make a judgment. 

I usually don’t reblog these kinds of posts, but I think it should also be pointed out that you have several hundred pieces of art depicting bare breasted women.

There is a reason that this isn’t ‘sexual’. The breasts, at a minimum, are an organ used to feed babies. The only reason they have become a sex icon is because society has turned it into one.

(Source: plague-of-locusts, via furiousdee)

  1. ibmarcus reblogged this from lindsaykisa
  2. lindsaykisa reblogged this from thispersonisillogical
  3. tinrossralvi reblogged this from plague-of-locusts
  4. nachsie reblogged this from dontmakepeopleintoheroes
  5. heeey-miss-murder reblogged this from stillwasamadman
  6. wanderlustandwonder reblogged this from stillwasamadman
  7. stillwasamadman reblogged this from justcarbonbased
  8. chocolatebreath reblogged this from dreaminginstasis
  9. jhengadeen reblogged this from chelsocool
  10. artisticawesomeness reblogged this from jo-hc and added:
    Just in case you needed another reason to think Rooney Mara is amazing.
  11. jo-hc reblogged this from izziesworldofizzie
  12. izziesworldofizzie reblogged this from boobs-radley
  13. themillionairess reblogged this from broken-clocks-and-hearts
  14. justanotherddreamerr reblogged this from broken-clocks-and-hearts
  15. themidnightcities reblogged this from furlabun
  16. broken-clocks-and-hearts reblogged this from mygayshoes
  17. sherlockssecretstash reblogged this from narcolassie
  18. narcolassie reblogged this from silencetoaster
  19. silencetoaster reblogged this from furlabun
  20. boobs-radley reblogged this from tyrhannahsaurus
  21. oncelerswaifu reblogged this from vaginampreg
  22. vaginampreg reblogged this from furlabun
  23. furlabun reblogged this from regulateddiscord